"What Would Obama Do?" is not a religious reference. This was just a fun way to remind supporters to remain positive during the campaign, to not engage in negative politics or partisan divisions. This is modelled after other celebrity "what would" sayings, such as "What Would Oprah Do?" "What Would Ozzy Do?" "What Would George Do?" (about George Washington), and hundreds of others. We have no intention of relating Barack Obama to Jesus or any other religious entity.

Monday, June 16, 2008

To be clear

I'd like to clarify my position on "being positive." I am not in any way advocating saying only nice things about Senator Obama's opponents. Instead, I'm suggesting, tell the complete truth, but do it respectfully. The "What Would Obama Do?" concept is not literal, either, in that, as grass roots campaigners, we can and should talk about issues in detail that often Obama cannot.

For example, Senator McCain has clearly stated that one of his essential goals is to appoint Supreme Court justices specifically to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/95b18512-d5b6-456e-90a2-12028d71df58.htm

It is not negative campaigning to point this out. It is not "dirty" to provide truthful and complete information on the opponent's positions. With the above issue, it is also not negative to mention that no previous modern presidential candidate has admitted that they would select Supreme Court justices based on a "litmus test" of this kind, either for or against an issue. It would be negative, though, to say something like, "John McCain hates women," which would not be productive or influential at all.

Negative campaigning about McCain would include, for example, his age, his personal relationship/marriage issues, his temper, or the Internet-based "Manchurian Candidate" issue. You'll never hear Obama talk about these things, but, instead, you'll hear him honor McCain's military service, then talk about the issues McCain has stated his position on.

Cindy McCain is off limits, other than her public statements, such as her comments about Michelle Obama. The reason is, if the Republicans bait us into attacking Cindy, it will blur the evilness of their attacks on Michelle. We MUST take the high ground, and let the Republicans look like fools throwing their poop at us like chimpanzees as we march proudly to the White House.

The key is, we don't need to go negative to win, and, in fact, it would only serve to hurt us. We're winning now, and we will continue to do so as people finally get to know McCain for who he is now (versus the "maverick" he was in 2000), and as people who were not paying attention to the primary start listening to Obama and learning who he is. We should be positive, hopeful, respectful, and understanding that there are valid other viewpoints than ours, so we can use this new form of campaigning to usher in a new era of politics along with a new President.

Labels: , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger alyceclover said...

Life is not all positive and that includes people. If I comment on what I see as a negative (too old) I do not think that is "dirty campaiging".

Who am I? Anti-elderly? Hardly. I hired ladies in their 70s and 80s, when in a position to hire people~because older workers tend to be more dependable and have better work ethics. I am a "cheerleader" often encouraging people to go for it, no matter their age. I will point out people who achieved goals late in life.

But they were not running for president. My reasons for "too old" are more practical. The older we are the more prone to health issues. McCain has had them. He does not look healthy in many pictures.

But it is the mindset that mostly concerns me. As I said of Ron Paul: stuck in the 1950s. Life changes and some older people get stuck in the past when it comes to thinking.

That is one of the reasons our country is having so many problems. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

McCain's position on bombing Iran would be a prime example of old age thinking not suitable for today's world. Likewise his Roe vs. Wade stance.

June 19, 2008 12:33 PM

 
Blogger Chuck Lasker said...

I understand. I would suggest, though, that it's not an "age" issue as it is an "outlook" issue. You can say that John McCain's views are outdated, without saying he's Too Old. My father is 80, an Obama supporter, and could outwit John McCain in 2 minutes with his progressive views that are completely up to date.

So, we can easily say we find that John McCain is "stuck in the past," or even that we are concerned about his mental state based on his hesitancy in speeches, forgetfulness, flipflopping, etc. that indicate that he, at any age, does not have all his faculties. We can also express concern about McCain's health, considering his cancer that can come back and kill him in a matter of days. This could happen to a 50 year old, too.

June 19, 2008 12:42 PM

 
Blogger Stargazer said...

Its awesome to read! I've been saying this for months so I'm glad to not feel so alone!

Thanks!

June 19, 2008 12:56 PM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

HOME  |  WRIST BAND  |  OBAMA SITE

© Copyright, 2008, Lasker Enterprises, Inc.
* "What Would Obama Do?" is not a religious reference. This is just a fun way to remind supporters to remain positive, to not engage in negative politics or partisan divisions. This is modelled after other celebrity "what would" sayings, such as "What Would Oprah Do?" "What Would Ozzy Do?" "What Would George Do?" (about George Washington), and hundreds of others. We have no intention of relating Barack Obama to Jesus or any other religious entity.